Both markets ask whether a specific national team will win the 2026 FIFA World Cup, set to be held in North America (USA, Canada, Mexico). Uzbekistan, a Central Asian nation, has never qualified for a World Cup. Congo DR (Democratic Republic of the Congo), an African nation, last qualified in 1974 and has never won the tournament. Both markets currently show 0% implied probability on the YES side, suggesting traders see virtually zero chance either team will emerge victorious from the 32-team tournament. The 0% price on both markets reflects trader conviction that neither nation is a realistic contender for World Cup glory. In the context of over 200 nations competing for qualification and only 32 spots available, long-shot markets like these reveal the field's collective skepticism about outsider nations reaching the tournament or advancing deep enough to win. This uniform 0% pricing across multiple dark-horse markets indicates confidence among prediction market participants about the likely tournament outcome and which teams have the resources, recent form, and historical quality to compete for the championship. These two outcomes are inherently correlated through a single constraint: only one team wins the World Cup. If either Uzbekistan or Congo DR were to win, the other's market would resolve to NO automatically. However, both outcomes share an extremely low probability of occurring—the real comparison is between how traders rank these two nations relative to the other ~30 teams in the tournament. Factors that could shift these markets include unexpected qualification success against stronger continental rivals, major injuries or instability affecting top contenders, favorable group-stage draws, or strategic shifts in either nation's football program. Traders monitoring these markets should track qualifying campaign performance, FIFA rankings volatility, coaching changes, and broader World Cup favorites market dynamics. A collapse among current champions or favorites could theoretically shift probability mass toward long shots. The 0% pricing reflects current trader conviction, not impossibility—any material change in either team's competitive prospects would likely move these prices and create trading opportunity for differentiated forecasts.