These two markets explore unlikely Democratic presidential nominees in 2028, both currently priced at 1% on the prediction curve. Kim Kardashian's market asks whether the reality TV personality and business entrepreneur—known primarily for fashion, beauty, and media ventures—would secure the Democratic nomination. Andrew Yang's market presents a second non-traditional candidate: the entrepreneur and former 2020 presidential candidate who campaigned on universal basic income and automation concerns. While neither has a background in electoral politics, they represent different varieties of outsiders—one recognized primarily for entertainment and celebrity, the other for Silicon Valley-style entrepreneurship and economic policy. Both markets trading at 1% YES indicate extreme skepticism from traders about either outcome. This pricing reflects the historical rarity of nominees without Congressional or gubernatorial experience, combined with the Democratic Party's traditional reliance on inside-track candidates. At these levels, the market is pricing in that a Kardashian or Yang nomination would require a fundamental shift in Democratic Party selection norms or an extraordinary political environment. The symmetrical 1% prices suggest traders view both as roughly equivalent long-shot scenarios, though the specific mechanisms underlying those prices may diverge—brand recognition and media reach for Kardashian versus prior campaign experience and policy visibility for Yang. The outcomes of these markets are unlikely to be strongly correlated. A Kardashian nomination would signal that celebrity and mass-media profile had become the decisive factor in presidential selection, reshaping party nomination conventions. A Yang nomination might indicate that economic anxiety, skepticism of traditional politicians, or populist movements had captured Democratic primary voters—dynamics that emerged in 2016 and 2020, but on the Republican side. These reflect different political equilibria. While both could theoretically occur, the circumstances propelling either to the nomination would indicate meaningfully different states of American politics. Traders monitoring these markets should track several indicators: Would either candidate build a sustained national organization or grassroots coalition before 2028? Would either pursue elected office or extended political activity in the interim? How do Democratic primary rules and delegate allocation evolve? Additionally, watch for broader cultural and economic trends—celebrity influence in politics, anti-establishment sentiment, macroeconomic conditions, and the overall 2028 primary field composition. If traditional candidates struggle or fracture, long-shot nominees of any background become incrementally more plausible; if establishment candidates regain dominance post-2026, both markets will likely contract further.