The possibility of the United States obtaining Iranian enriched uranium represents one of the most closely watched developments in global nuclear proliferation discussions. This event aggregates three prediction markets that track the same underlying question across different deadlines: whether the US will obtain Iranian enriched uranium by May 31, 2026, by June 30, 2026, and by December 31, 2026. These markets are grouped together because they share the same fundamental outcome but differ in their timeframes, creating a natural timeline for observing how market expectations shift as 2026 progresses. By comparing odds across the three deadlines, readers can discern what the prediction market collectively believes about the likely timing of such a development. If probabilities concentrate on the earlier deadline, it signals market participants expect rapid diplomatic or political movement. If odds distribute more evenly or lean toward later dates, it indicates market uncertainty about near-term likelihood. The spreads between markets also reveal sentiment patterns—a narrow gap between May and June probabilities suggests the market sees little differentiation in those timeframes, while a significant jump between June and December might indicate expectations that any development would likely occur in the second half of the year or not at all. Traders, analysts, and policy observers monitoring geopolitical risk, nuclear diplomacy, and US-Iran relations can use these markets as real-time indicators of what informed participants believe about the probability and timing of this critical issue. When reviewing the prices below, remember that each market reflects the aggregate judgment of traders. Higher prices indicate higher perceived probability, while lower prices suggest lower expectations. The relationships between these three timeframes offer a window into how the prediction market community views the trajectory of this outcome over the course of 2026.