Connect wallet to trade · No wallet? Passkey login available · Free alerts at /subscribe
The Israel-Iran conflict spans decades of direct military confrontations, proxy warfare through Lebanese Hezbollah and Palestinian militias, and repeated cycles of escalation and localized ceasefires. A permanent peace deal between the two nations would require diplomatic recognition, mutual security guarantees, and resolution of existential disputes over nuclear programs, regional influence, and Palestinian statehood—issues that have resisted resolution across multiple international negotiations. The May 31 deadline gives only 15 days for what would be an unprecedented diplomatic breakthrough. Current market odds at 4% reflect the structural difficulty of achieving lasting peace in such a compressed timeframe, with traders skeptical of any major announcement or framework agreement materializing by month-end. Recent weeks have seen intermittent ceasefire discussions mediated by third parties, but these typically address immediate operational pauses rather than permanent settlements. The low odds suggest traders view a permanent deal as virtually impossible without a dramatic external shock—a change in political leadership, a major terror incident, or unprecedented international pressure—that could shift negotiating positions overnight. Most analyst commentary frames the 15-day window as insufficient for the level of confidence-building and institutional agreement permanent peace would require.
What factors could move this market?
Israel and Iran have been locked in a strategic rivalry since Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution, evolving from direct military conflict in the 1980s Gulf War (where Israel tacitly supported Iraq) through decades of proxy competition. Iran's military capabilities have grown—particularly its ballistic missile arsenal and influence through regional militia networks—while Israel has maintained overwhelming conventional military superiority and nuclear deterrence. The underlying disputes are profound: Iran seeks to position itself as the champion of anti-Israel movements and Palestinian rights, viewing Israel as an illegitimate colonial implant in the region. Israel views Iran's nuclear program and regional proxy networks as existential threats and demands Iranian recognition of Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state—a red line Iran has historically refused to cross. The Lebanon dimension, referenced in market tags, reflects Hezbollah's status as both a Lebanese political party and an Iranian-backed militant organization. Any permanent Israel-Iran peace framework would require Hezbollah's status and armament to be negotiated, adding a third-party complication to bilateral talks. For the market to resolve YES by May 31, multiple dramatic shifts would need to align: leadership changes in Tehran or Jerusalem willing to overturn decades of policy, rapid international mediation facilitated by major powers (the US, EU, Russia, China), and public declaration of a permanent peace framework that both publics could accept. Historical precedent is instructive: the Camp David Accords between Israel and Egypt took months of secret talks and presidential-level commitment; the Abraham Accords (Israel-UAE, Israel-Bahrain) addressed less existential disputes than Iran-Israel rivalry and still took years of groundwork. A genuine permanent peace deal would require security arrangements, reparations discussions, and mutual recognition frameworks that simply cannot be negotiated in 15 days. What could push odds toward YES: (1) A political coup or sudden regime change in either country installing reformist leadership; (2) An unprecedented international agreement (UN, Gulf Council) imposing a settlement on both parties; (3) A catastrophic escalation (nuclear incident, massive terror attack) forcing both sides to the negotiating table under external pressure. What pushes odds toward NO: (1) No current diplomatic channel is publicly known to be operating at that level; (2) Both governments derive domestic legitimacy partly from confronting the other; (3) Regional allies (Saudi Arabia, Russia, Syria) have competing interests in an Israel-Iran peace and could block it. The 4% odds reflect that the YES scenario requires not just peace, but permanent peace—a binding, long-term settlement—in a 15-day window, which markets price as near-impossible without a genuine black swan event.
What are traders watching for?
May 31, 2026 deadline—any permanent peace framework must be publicly announced and formalized before market close.
Leadership changes in Tehran or Jerusalem that could shift negotiating positions; reformist factions pressing for diplomacy.
UN Security Council or international mediation efforts—public signals from mediators about breakthrough negotiations.
Regional escalation or security incidents—terror attacks or military confrontations that could force emergency talks.
Gulf Council or Arab state involvement—pressure from Saudi Arabia, UAE, or other stakeholders to impose settlement.
How does this market resolve?
The market resolves YES if a binding permanent peace deal between Israel and Iran is publicly announced and confirmed by May 31, 2026. Otherwise it resolves NO.
Polymarket Trade is an independent third-party interface to the Polymarket CLOB prediction market exchange on Polygon — not affiliated with Polymarket, Inc. Prediction markets aggregate trader expectations into real-time probability estimates. Every market question resolves YES or NO based on a specific event outcome; traders buy shares of the side they believe will resolve positively. Prices range 0¢ (certain no) to 100¢ (certain yes) and naturally reflect the crowd-implied probability of YES. Polymarket Trade is non-custodial — your funds never leave your wallet. Open the full interactive page linked above to place orders, see order book depth, and execute a trade.
