Connect wallet to trade · No wallet? Passkey login available · Free alerts at /subscribe
The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman, represents one of the world's most critical geopolitical chokepoints, with roughly 20% of global petroleum trade passing through annually. This market asks whether the Netherlands—a NATO member and EU power—will deploy naval vessels through the strait by May 31, 2026. The 1% YES odds suggest traders assign extremely low probability to such a deployment within the next 15 days. At current odds, the market implies no major escalation in regional tensions is expected in the near term, and that even if tensions rise, the Netherlands is unlikely to act independently rather than through coordinated NATO or EU frameworks. The narrow timeframe and modest liquidity suggest limited conviction either direction, with traders viewing a unilateral Dutch naval transit through this disputed and sensitive waterway as an exceptionally unlikely scenario given diplomatic norms and alliance coordination protocols.
What factors could move this market?
The Strait of Hormuz has served as a focal point of geopolitical tension for decades, particularly since the 1979 Iranian Revolution when control of the waterway became a core element of Iran's regional strategy and Western concerns about oil supply security. Approximately 20% of global seaborne crude oil and liquefied natural gas passes through the strait, making any disruption to traffic an immediate matter of international concern and economic consequence. The Netherlands, as a NATO member and historically significant European naval power, maintains interests in freedom of navigation, regional stability, and the rules-based international order, but typically coordinates major military operations through multilateral frameworks rather than acting unilaterally.
For the market to resolve YES, the Netherlands would need to make an explicit decision to deploy warships through the Hormuz strait by May 31, 2026. This could occur under several scenarios: a significant escalation in Iranian aggression toward commercial shipping or Western naval assets, a formal NATO consensus on a freedom-of-navigation operation requiring multiple national contributions, or a European-led initiative to protect strategic interests. Historical precedent shows European naval presence in the region—including occasional transits and port visits—but such operations are typically announced and coordinated through alliance structures. A unilateral Dutch transit through this contested waterway would be exceptionally rare and would likely represent either a significant shift in regional dynamics or a response to a concrete security threat.
Factors pushing toward YES include: Iranian threats to close or blockade the strait, direct attacks on Western commercial or military vessels, NATO consensus triggering a coordinated freedom-of-navigation operation requiring multiple national contributions, or a crisis severe enough to justify independent action. Dutch naval capabilities are modest compared to major powers, so independent deployment would likely only occur if perceived as necessary to protect vital interests or in coordination with allied nations.
Factors pushing toward NO include: the extremely short 15-day timeframe, absence of any current major escalation signal in regional rhetoric or military movements, the Netherlands' strong historical preference for multilateral coordination over unilateral military action, the diplomatic costs of appearing to provoke Iran, and the likelihood that any serious regional crisis would be addressed through established NATO command structures and U.S.-led coalitions.
The 1% odds reflect trader consensus that within a two-week window, the probability of Dutch warships transiting Hormuz remains negligible. Current geopolitical conditions show no imminent catalyst for emergency deployment. The market's extremely low odds and relatively modest liquidity suggest limited trader conviction in either direction, typical of tail-risk events assigned low baseline probability.
What are traders watching for?
Iranian escalation—attacks on tankers, closure threats, or hostile military activity—could trigger NATO coordination and Dutch response.
Watch for NATO naval coordination announcements, freedom-of-navigation operations, or multinational task force formations in coming weeks.
Regional tensions, oil price volatility, and U.S.-Iran diplomatic developments will be primary indicators of escalation risk.
Any unilateral Dutch military decision would require extraordinary circumstances or security threat not currently present in regional intelligence.
How does this market resolve?
The market resolves YES if the Netherlands sends warships through the Strait of Hormuz by May 31, 2026. Resolution requires official government or military confirmation of deployment.
Polymarket Trade is an independent third-party interface to the Polymarket CLOB prediction market exchange on Polygon — not affiliated with Polymarket, Inc. Prediction markets aggregate trader expectations into real-time probability estimates. Every market question resolves YES or NO based on a specific event outcome; traders buy shares of the side they believe will resolve positively. Prices range 0¢ (certain no) to 100¢ (certain yes) and naturally reflect the crowd-implied probability of YES. Polymarket Trade is non-custodial — your funds never leave your wallet. Open the full interactive page linked above to place orders, see order book depth, and execute a trade.
