The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meets in April to set monetary policy, and with 12 voting members holding diverse views on economic conditions, disagreement is often part of the process. Each member votes on the Committee's policy decision, and those who disagree publicly dissent, signaling their concerns about the chosen rate path or other directives. Dissent is a normal feature of central banking—it reflects the legitimate differences of opinion among experienced economists about how to balance inflation, employment, and economic stability. These five prediction markets aggregate forecasts on how many governors will dissent from the April decision, covering every possible outcome from zero dissents (complete consensus) to four or more (substantial disagreement). The probability distribution across these scenarios reveals what market participants and analysts anticipate about Fed cohesion heading into the meeting. Observers of monetary policy pay close attention to dissent patterns because they illuminate the strength of the Committee's consensus and the intensity of internal debate. A higher number of dissents might reflect growing concerns within the Fed about the policy direction, while a unanimous vote suggests strong agreement on the economic outlook and appropriate policy stance. By tracking real-time odds on each dissent outcome, you can gauge market expectations not just for the decision itself, but for the confidence and unity behind it. These prediction markets aggregate the collective judgment of professional traders, economists, and market participants worldwide, creating a transparent price discovery mechanism for one of the most consequential economic events globally.